Animals,
what are they to us? We use them as a source of entertainment, love, labor, and
even have them become our companions. But what about people who don't care for
them? Some people disregard them if they have no use to us. We see dead animals
on the streets from being run over or being thrown out because they are of no
use to them, another life form deciding whether or not another life form is
worthy of living. Who are we to say whether or not another life should be ended
just because they cannot communicate in our language? As humans we feel a sort
of superiority over other life forms, yet we run and hide if they were to ever
chase and hunt us down. Depending on the animal, we have to use weapons to fend
them off. Are we superior because we can use tools? Monkeys can use tools yet
we are still on a higher level than they are. Our sense of superiority also
allows us to become arrogant and ignorant. Yes, we have made incredible
progress in the last thousand years, we can think for ourselves and better ourselves
on a more advanced level than animals do, but does that justify us to decide
whether or not another life form should live? While what I've been saying is
merely just a complaint with no legitimate use to helping animals, there are
organizations in the world helping animals, attempting to conserve them and
their environment and giving
them rights.Organizations such as PETA, People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals, and the World Wildlife Fund, WWF, made it their mission to help animals in need. PETA’s mission is to aid animals that are suffering from a variety of abuse. From being physically hurt to having them undergo environments that do more harm than good are the things that PETA target when aiding animals. With over 3 million supporters and members, PETA are still growing in size. Though I support the cause that PETA is doing, I don’t entirely agree with how they make those commercials depicting the faces of abused animals. By showing those images and asking for a donation, people tend to feel bad when they do not donate. I believe that asking for donations is fine, but to make the audience feel like complete shit afterwards shouldn’t be the message that PETA should be spreading. The other organization that I mentioned before is WWF. The World Wildlife Fund works a bit differently than PETA. WWF’s mission is to “conserve nature and reduce the most pressing threats to the diversity of life on Earth.” While they do ask for donations, they do not make the viewers feel bad. Both organization’s motive are to aid animals and though they have different ways of spreading their message they are still doing it for a cause that seems to only reach a few million people out of billions.
If you really did care about animals, why not use the emotions of viewers to generate funding for the cause? Yeah it may be moderately unethical and morally unfit to manipulate viewers, but think of the puppies!!!!
ReplyDeleteHonestly Eric, I am disappointed in you. Here we are saying we both love animals, and yet you're not willing to exploit human emotions to save them. Instead you'd rather support at group such as WWF that doesn't pressure people to donate, but instead displays the statistics and kindly asks for donations and support.
YOU SICKEN ME
Nobody likes you McGehee
DeleteI feel like we all just need to take a chill pill and calm down guys! Just like hug and maybe kiss it out... i mean just saying...
DeleteWoah bro where is all this anger coming from?
DeleteI really feel the power in this ad. I love, love tigers and actually their population has increased over the years. I don't know if its due to this company but it's good to know there are organizations like these.
ReplyDeleteThe resource you should add would be some of the videos on youtube that peta has put out. Some are very strong and really make you think about where you're buying from
ReplyDeletehttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QFgWotRo4So
Delete